Inconsistency in Handling Farm Income?

Thumbnail Image
Date
2003-05-16
Authors
Harl, Neil
McEowen, Roger
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Iowa State University Digital Repository
The Iowa State University Digital Repository is the open access institutional repository for the university to collect, manage, share, and preserve free, worldwide access to research and scholarship of Iowa State faculty, staff, and students. Material in the Digital Repository covers a wide range of disciplines from engineering to social sciences to arts and humanities.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Iowa State University Digital Repository
Abstract

With government farm payments making up close to half of net farm income (and nearly 100 percent in some states), the focus on how the subsidies are to be reported has taken on added importance. The problem is complicated by three features—(1) farmers can elect to have Commodity Credit Corporation loans (which is the vehicle for two of the three ways program benefits are delivered to farmers and landowners) treated as loans or as income; (2) the subsidies are delivered to eligible participants in three distinctly different systems of payments; and (3) dollar limitations on payments have been imposed by the Congress although in recent years Congress has provided a way to avoid the payment limitations. The latter involves the use of a special statute-based procedure which involves what are known as commodity certificates. The evidence indicates that the principal use of commodity certificates is for cotton and rice with a modest use for soybeans. Relatively little use of commodity certificates has been observed for corn and wheat.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Collections