•  
  •  
 

Abstract

A 2014 Tax Court case, DeBough v. Commissioner,1 has clarified the handling of an installment sale transaction involving the sale of a principal residence where the buyer defaulted with the property repossessed by the original seller.2 The decision places a premium on acting promptly to resell after repossession if the Section 121 exclusion has been applied in the original transaction.3 The income tax consequences of the repossession can be significant if resale is delayed for more than a year.4

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.