Organizational Learning Implications of Partnering Flexibility in Project-Venture Settings: A Multilevel Framework

Thumbnail Image
Date
2011-01-01
Authors
Schwab, Andreas
Miner, Anne
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Schwab, Andreas
Associate Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Management and Entrepreneurship

The Department of Management and Entrepreneurship seeks to provide students with the knowledge of organizations and management functions within organizations. Graduates will be able to understand work-related behavior, competitive strategy and advantage, strategies of international business, and human-resource management practices.

History
The Department of Management was formed in 1984 in the College of Business Administration (later College of Business).

Dates of Existence
1984 - present

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Management and Entrepreneurship
Abstract

Project ventures are an increasingly prevalent organizational form in many industries. The management literature has stressed their flexibility and adaptability advantages. This chapter focuses on the learning implications of the source of flexibility most essential to project ventures: the ability to switch partners during project formation and execution. This partnering flexibility creates opportunities to respond to new knowledge about characteristics of project tasks and project partners. Partnering flexibility, however, also creates learning challenges. The short-term nature of relationships between project partners and the disintegration of the project team after project completion challenges the accumulation and transfer of knowledge to future projects. Beyond the introduction of related learning opportunities and challenges, we identify potential contingency factors in the project context that shape when partner flexibility will have beneficial versus harmful effects. On the organizational level, we propose that project-governing permanent organizations can support project-venture learning. On the industry level, we highlight potential learning benefits of standardized partner roles and coordination practices. Thus, our chapter introduces a multilevel contingency framework for the evaluation of both learning opportunities and challenges of partnering flexibility in project-venture settings. We formulate testable propositions focused on partner-project fit and project performance.

Comments

This is a manuscript of an book chapter from Advances in Strategic Management: Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management, 28 (2011); 115-145. Doi: 10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028009. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2011
Collections