An Evaluation of Student Performance on Traditional vs. Synopsis Laboratory Reports in Industrial Technology

Thumbnail Image
Date
2008-01-01
Authors
Hoffa, David
Freeman, Steven
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Freeman, Steven
University Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Abstract

Prior research demonstrated that writing synopsis laboratory reports (succinct syntheses of the experiment, lecture, and readings) instead of traditional laboratory reports, did not influence student learning as measured by comprehensive exam scores. This study extended this research by investigating the impact of these lab report formats on student learning as measured by laboratory report scores. Fifty-six Iowa State University industrial technology students were randomized into one of two groups that were required to write five synopsis reports followed by four traditional reports or vice-versa. The analysis of mean laboratory report scores using the paired-samples t-test revealed no significant difference between treatments. The analysis of the mean scores of the nine individual laboratory reports using two-sample t-tests revealed no treatment effect for seven of the nine reports. The results of an exit survey revealed that students believed the synopsis format helped them to achieve higher grades on their laboratory reports.

Comments

Copyright 2008 by Georgia Southern University reproduced with permission from International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2008
Collections