A Critique of Two Methods for Assessing the Nutrient Adequacy of Diets

Thumbnail Image
Date
1991-06-01
Authors
Nusser, Sarah
Riddick, Howard
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Jensen, Helen
Professor Emeritus
Person
Nusser, Sarah
Professor Emerita
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Abstract

The adequacy of diets can be assessed using several analytical approaches. This paper reviews two methods of assessment: a cutoff method, which estimates the percentage of the population having usual intakes below a given value; and a probability method, which assesses the percentage of the population whose usual intakes are below their individual requirements.

First, the concept pf usual nutrient intakes and the problems associated with estimating usual intake distributions are discussed. Next, the two methods of dietary assessment and their related assumptions are described and compared. The more specific inference of the probability method is shown to rely on its assumptions and data that are currently not available. While the cutoff method is simpler, its use may result in misclassification errors and its estimates are highly influenced by the cutoff standard selected.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Collections