Appropriate Analytical Methods are Necessary to Assess Nontarget Effects of Insecticidal Proteins in GM Crops Through Meta-Analysis (Response to Andow et al. 2009)

Thumbnail Image
Date
2009-12-01
Authors
Shelton, Anthony
Naranjo, Steven
Romeis, Jörg
Hellmich, Richard
Wolt, Jeffrey
Federici, Brian
Albajes, Ramon
Bigler, Franz
Burgess, Elisabeth
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Hellmich, Richard
Emeritus USDA-ARS Research Entomologist Emeritus Affiliate Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Entomology

The Department of Entomology seeks to teach the study of insects, their life-cycles, and the practicalities in dealing with them, for use in the fields of business, industry, education, and public health. The study of entomology can be applied towards evolution and ecological sciences, and insects’ relationships with other organisms & humans, or towards an agricultural or horticultural focus, focusing more on pest-control and management.

History
The Department of Entomology was founded in 1975 as a result of the division of the Department of Zoology and Entomology.

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Entomology
Abstract

The suggestion by Andow et al. that we have “fundamental criticisms of meta-analysis” is a red herring that diverts attention away from the real debate over the merits of different meta-analytic approaches. Our criticism is directed to the meta-analysis by Lövei et al. (2009) and not to all meta-analyses per se. Additionally, the seven “findings” added to the end of Andow et al. (2009) with the phrase that that “they were not disputed by Shelton et al. (2009)” works counter to a full and objective debate in the scientific literature.

Comments

This article is from Environmental Entomology 38 (2009): 1533, doi:10.1603/022.038.0603.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Collections