Stocking system effects on cattle performance, forage, and soil properties of cool-season pastures

Thumbnail Image
Date
2013-01-01
Authors
Dunn, Margaret
Major Professor
Advisor
James R. Russell
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Animal Science

The Department of Animal Science originally concerned itself with teaching the selection, breeding, feeding and care of livestock. Today it continues this study of the symbiotic relationship between animals and humans, with practical focuses on agribusiness, science, and animal management.

History
The Department of Animal Husbandry was established in 1898. The name of the department was changed to the Department of Animal Science in 1962. The Department of Poultry Science was merged into the department in 1971.

Historical Names

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Animal Science
Abstract

Increasing stocking density and rotation frequency of grazing cattle may improve forage yield and quality and soil carbon content, but may reduce livestock performance and forage persistence and compact soil. Sixty mature August-calving Angus cows (Bos taurus L.; mean body weight (BW), 585 ± 9.9 kg) were allotted to six 4.05-ha cool-season pastures to graze by rotational (RS), strip (SS), or mob (MS) stocking from May through September for two years (2010-2011). Stocking density averaged 16 000, 80 000, and 350 000 kg BW * ha-1 * d-1 in RS, SS, and MS pastures, respectively. Daily live forage allowance was equal across treatments. Forage was offered as an entire paddock until 50% of the forage dry matter (DM) was removed or as strips either one or four times daily in RS, SS, and MS pastures, respectively. Stocking density did not significantly affect cow BW, body condition, or grazing selectivity; calf birth weight, average daily gain, or survival; forage mass, botanical composition, in vitro DM disappearance, or crude protein concentration; or soil moisture, carbon content, or water infiltration rate. Mean monthly forage disappearance was lower in RS than MS and SS pastures in May and June (month*treatment, P < 0.01); lower in RS than MS pastures in 2010, and lower in RS than SS and MS pastures in 2011 (year*treatment, P = 0.02). Soil bulk density tended to be lower in SS than RS pastures in July, but was greater in SS than RS pastures in October in both years (month*treatment, P = 0.07). Results demonstrate that in the first two years of implementation, increased stocking density with adequate forage allowance does not significantly affect cow or calf performance, forage mass or composition, or soil physical properties.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2013