A comparison of carbon storage potential in corn- and prairie-based agroecosystems

Thumbnail Image
Date
2014-01-01
Authors
Dietzel, Ranae
Major Professor
Advisor
Matt Liebman
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Agronomy

The Department of Agronomy seeks to teach the study of the farm-field, its crops, and its science and management. It originally consisted of three sub-departments to do this: Soils, Farm-Crops, and Agricultural Engineering (which became its own department in 1907). Today, the department teaches crop sciences and breeding, soil sciences, meteorology, agroecology, and biotechnology.

History
The Department of Agronomy was formed in 1902. From 1917 to 1935 it was known as the Department of Farm Crops and Soils.

Dates of Existence
1902–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Farm Crops and Soils (1917–1935)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Agronomy
Abstract

Increasing carbon (C) in the soil is important both for removing harmful C from the atmosphere and improving the health of the soil. In this dissertation, I set out to examine how planting and harvesting prairies on soils suitable for corn affected soil C storage potential when compared to corn-based systems. I addressed three questions designed to a) improve our understanding of the fundamental differences between how prairies and corn grow throughout the year, b) test how prairies and corn add C to the soil after establishment, and c) use our current understanding of prairie and corn growth and C and N dynamics to predict how SOC will change over the next 50 years. Measurements of fundamental differences showed corn produced more aboveground and overall biomass with faster growth rates that peaked later in the season than prairie. Duration of growth was shorter in corn than prairie. Corn allocated a much smaller proportion of its biomass belowground than prairie and produced much less root biomass than prairie. Corn biomass had higher N concentrations, but less efficient growth relative to these concentrations. Six years after establishment of the experiment, I found prairies had more root mass that was more recalcitrant and located at depths unfavorable to decomposition, but did not have greater amounts of labile C (POXC) or total SOC than corn-based treatments, nor greater amounts of total SOC than in the establishment year. However, it was important to note that prairies placed ~5 times more C belowground as root C than corn-based treatments. Simulations made over 50 years using the APSIM model showed that prairies had much larger increases in root C, fresh organic matter, and microbial biomass pools, while a corn-based system with a winter cover crop maintained these pools, and continuous corn and corn-soybean rotations lost C in these pools. However, all treatments lost C from the more stable C pool, resulting in an overall loss of SOC after 50 years. The lack of gain in soil C was attributed to a combination of C-saturated soils and rhizosphere-induced priming. However, the validity of these mechanisms needs more investigation.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2014