Effects of drainage water management in Southeast Iowa

Thumbnail Image
Date
2015-01-01
Authors
Schott, Linda
Major Professor
Advisor
Matthew J. Helmers
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering

Since 1905, the Department of Agricultural Engineering, now the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ABE), has been a leader in providing engineering solutions to agricultural problems in the United States and the world. The department’s original mission was to mechanize agriculture. That mission has evolved to encompass a global view of the entire food production system–the wise management of natural resources in the production, processing, storage, handling, and use of food fiber and other biological products.

History
In 1905 Agricultural Engineering was recognized as a subdivision of the Department of Agronomy, and in 1907 it was recognized as a unique department. It was renamed the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering in 1990. The department merged with the Department of Industrial Education and Technology in 2004.

Dates of Existence
1905–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Agricultural Engineering (1907–1990)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Abstract

Subsurface drainage, while necessary for maximizing row crop production in Iowa, short-circuits nitrate-N downstream. Drainage water management practices, such as controlled drainage and shallow drainage, have been shown to reduce NO3-N loss by reducing the volume of water leaving the field.

The first investigation in this thesis focuses on how drainage water management effects crop yield, drainage volumes, NO3-N loss, depth to water table, and volumetric water content using data eight years of data collected from 2007 to 2014 at a drainage research site in Southeast Iowa from four treatments: controlled drainage, shallow drainage, conventional drainage, and no drainage. Controlled and shallow drainage reduced NO3-N loads by 49% and 42%, respectively. There were yield reductions from the shallow and controlled drainage treatments, as well as no drainage, especially in wet years.

The second investigation concentrates on if drainage water management practices effected the planting dates of corn from 2012 to 2015 at the same research site. None of the four treatments affected volumetric water content near the surface where corn would be planted. Soil temperature at 10 cm was significantly greater in the undrained and shallow drainage treatments, but the reason is unknown. There were differences in depth to water table between treatments, which may impact the date of planting if the water table is near the surface.

The third study investigates how shallow and controlled drainage practices affected peak drainage and water table recession time compared to the conventional treatment for four small drainage events. There was no difference between treatments in the time to peak discharge, but shallow drainage increased peak discharge in two events wile controlled increased peak discharge during one event. There was no difference between treatments in time of water table recession,

Due to growing concerns over the hypoxia zone in the Gulf of Mexico, further research should be conducted for both drainage water management practices at other sites in Iowa and across the Midwest as a practice to reduce nutrient losses. This research should focus on how these practices can either maintain or increase crop yields to make these practices more affordable to producers.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2015