Degree Type


Date of Award


Degree Name

Master of Science





First Advisor

Timothy R. Derrick


With the popularity of non-traditional and off-road race events on the rise, the number of runners encountering trail surfaces has undergone a marked increase in recent years. Despite the growing popularity of trail and off-road running, little research has been done to investigate the effects of running on irregular surfaces. PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate the kinematic and metabolic effects of running on an irregular surface. We hypothesized that the irregular surface would cause runners to reduce frontal plane foot inversion and increase knee flexion at contact, increasing the metabolic cost of running and shock attenuation. We also examined how altering the frontal plane foot angle at contact using real-time feedback would affect these other variables. METHODS: Sixteen participants completed three running bouts lasting 5-7 minutes each on an irregular surface (IS) treadmill created by attaching wooden slats, on a traditional smooth surface (SS) treadmill, and on SS while receiving visual feedback of the frontal plane foot angle at contact (SSF) with a goal of matching IS foot angle on SS. Participants were outfitted with reflective markers on the pelvis and lower limb and accelerometers on the distal anteromedial tibia and frontal bone of the forehead. For a portion of each condition, participants breathed through a mouthpiece for the measurement of the rate of oxygen consumption ( O2). Statistical analysis was completed using a one-way repeated measures ANOVA with a Sidak post hoc correction to set α=0.0127. RESULTS: Frontal plane foot angle increased by 40% from IS to SS (IS: 8.4±4.09°, SS: 11.8±4.52°, p<0.0001). Knee flexion angle decreased by 33% from IS to SS (IS: 9.23±4.88°, SS: 6.22±5.03°, p<0.0001). Rate of oxygen consumption decreased by 10% from IS to SS (IS: 37.9±5.68 ml·kg-1·min-1, SS: 34.1±5.07 ml·kg-1·min-1, p<0.0001). Frontal plane foot angle decreased by 14% from SS to SSF (SS: 11.8±4.52°, SSF: 10.1±4.42°, p=0.027) but did not result in significant changes in any variables. There were no significant differences in shock attenuation between any conditions (IS: -9.8±2.26 dB, SS: -9.5±3.12 dB, SSF: -9.9±2.62 dB, p=0.671). CONCLUSION: Running with less inversion at contact on the irregular surface may be an attempt by runners to reduce the perceived potential of an inversion ankle sprain. Muscles of the knee and ankle can absorb impact shock but their effectiveness depends on the angle at contact. As a partial compensation for the decreased foot angle at contact, runners increased knee flexion. This maintained shock attenuation but rate of oxygen consumption was increased. Altering the foot angle at contact using feedback on the SS did result in increased knee angle at contact, but did not change shock attenuation or metabolic cost.

Copyright Owner

Alyssa M. Gantz



File Format


File Size

58 pages

Included in

Kinesiology Commons