Growth, productivity, and utilization of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.): A promising fiber and fuel crop for Iowa

Thumbnail Image
Date
2016-01-01
Authors
Bourguignon, Marie
Major Professor
Advisor
Kenneth Moore
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Agronomy

The Department of Agronomy seeks to teach the study of the farm-field, its crops, and its science and management. It originally consisted of three sub-departments to do this: Soils, Farm-Crops, and Agricultural Engineering (which became its own department in 1907). Today, the department teaches crop sciences and breeding, soil sciences, meteorology, agroecology, and biotechnology.

History
The Department of Agronomy was formed in 1902. From 1917 to 1935 it was known as the Department of Farm Crops and Soils.

Dates of Existence
1902–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Farm Crops and Soils (1917–1935)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Agronomy
Abstract

Producing natural fibers to replace finite synthetic fibers is a good strategy to move from a petroleum-based society to a bioeconomy. Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) has been identified as a promising multi-purpose crop that could have potential to grow in the Midwest. It is critical to determine the varieties and management practices that are optimal to produce high quantity and quality of kenaf fibers in Iowa, where corn and soybean are prevalent. Information regarding its potential for biofuel is scarce and requires to be investigated. Finally, consequences of including kenaf in traditional cropping systems on soil quality need to be studied in this area of the U.S.

In the first study (Chapter 2), we demonstrated that ‘Tainung 2’ and ‘Whitten’ were the most promising in Iowa. Also, when its biomass was pyrolyzed, kenaf could have potential in the production of levoglucosan that can be further upgraded into ethanol. Our second study (Chapter 3) showed that it exists an optimal combination of management practices that influenced kenaf productivity and morphology. In the third study (Chapter 4), we found that N fertilization does not have any influence on kenaf stem production. However, N and other agricultural practices did influence morphology and composition. Our fourth study (Chapter 5) investigated kenaf productivity in Iowa and Kentucky. The results showed that Kentucky has more potential than Iowa, but that kenaf production in Iowa was less variable than in Kentucky. Finally, in our fifth study (Chapter 6), we developed a model in APSIM for kenaf, which was used to analyze the effects of kenaf inclusion in corn-soybean systems on soil quality. Overall, this work showed that kenaf could be a promising alternative crop in Iowa.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017