Transfer from ESL academic writing to first year composition and other disciplinary courses: An assessment perspective

Thumbnail Image
Date
2016-01-01
Authors
Lee, Jooyoung
Major Professor
Advisor
Carol A. Chapelle
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
English

The Department of English seeks to provide all university students with the skills of effective communication and critical thinking, as well as imparting knowledge of literature, creative writing, linguistics, speech and technical communication to students within and outside of the department.

History
The Department of English and Speech was formed in 1939 from the merger of the Department of English and the Department of Public Speaking. In 1971 its name changed to the Department of English.

Dates of Existence
1939-present

Historical Names

  • Department of English and Speech (1939-1971)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
English
Abstract

Many American universities offer ESL academic writing courses to help international students prepare for written communication in other university courses. This study investigated the connections and/or disconnections across an ESL writing course, a first-year composition course, and content courses at Iowa State University from the perspective of writing assessment. As a longitudinal mixed-methods study, data were collected over one academic year from 108 international students, 14 instructors of an ESL writing course, 18 instructors of a first-year composition course, and four instructors of content courses. Quantitative data included grades on written assignments and survey responses, while qualitative data consisted of course documents such as assignment sheets and scoring rubrics, written assignments, instructors’ written feedback on students’ drafts, interview recordings, and survey responses.

The study found that the ESL writing course was not very well connected to the first-year composition or content courses in terms of writing assessment. There was a close correspondence across the three writing contexts in terms of evaluation criteria, but not in terms of writing tasks and the grades that students actually received on their writing assignments. Also, students’ performance on the written assessment in the ESL writing course was not a reliable indicator of their readiness for writing in other courses. In addition, although students were positive about the learning transfer from the ESL writing to other courses, the first-year composition and content course instructors were negative about it. These findings have implications for revising writing assignments, modifying evaluation practice, and determining ways to enhance learning transfer across the three writing contexts. Although the study was conducted within the context of Iowa State University, the findings are expected to have relevance beyond this particular institution given that ESL academic writing courses in American universities are designed in a more or less similar way and share comparable goals as those offered at Iowa State University.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2016