Interaction of Automation Visibility and Information Quality in Flight Deck Information Automation View Document

Thumbnail Image
Date
2017-07-14
Authors
Dorneich, Michael
Dudley, Rachel
Letsu-Dake, Emmanuel
Rogers, William
Whitlow, Stephen
Dillard, Michael
Nelson, Erik
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Dorneich, Michael
Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering
The Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering teaches the design, analysis, and improvement of the systems and processes in manufacturing, consulting, and service industries by application of the principles of engineering. The Department of General Engineering was formed in 1929. In 1956 its name changed to Department of Industrial Engineering. In 1989 its name changed to the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Aerospace EngineeringVirtual Reality Applications CenterIndustrial and Manufacturing Systems EngineeringVirtual Reality Applications Center
Abstract

An empirical study evaluated key human factors issues related to automation visibility and information quality, based on a refined definition of information automation. Next-generation air transportation system operational concepts will dramatically affect the types and amount of information available on flight decks. Information automation systems collect, process, and present information to support pilot tasks and awareness. The definition of flight deck information automation was refined to differentiate it from other types of automation. Pilots interacted with an example information automation system to investigate the premise that automation visibility will have an impact on the ability of pilots to detect problems resulting from poor information quality. Poor information quality appeared to be difficult for pilots to detect, even when presented with high automation visibility. Pilots tended to over-trust automation, so when reporting high workload and information was missing, they chose the top plan suggested by the automation even though it was not the best. Trust in automation was reduced by low information quality, but compensated for by increased automation visibility. Added information to help pilots understand information automation state and outputs, given a level of information quality, should be balanced against potential increases in pilot workload due to the time and attention needed to process the extra information.

Comments

This is a manuscript of an article published as Dorneich, Michael C., Rachel Dudley, Emmanuel Letsu-Dake, William Rogers, Stephen D. Whitlow, Michael C. Dillard, and Erik Nelson. "Interaction of Automation Visibility and Information Quality in Flight Deck Information Automation." IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems (2017), doi:10.1109/THMS.2017.2717939. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017
Collections