The Double-edge Sword of Limited Edition Fashion Marketing

Thumbnail Image
Date
2016-11-09
Authors
Choi, Jin Woo
Cluver, Brigitte
Kim, Minjeong
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference Proceedings
Iowa State University Conferences and Symposia

The first national meeting of textile and clothing professors took place in Madison, Wisconsin in June 1959. With a mission to advance excellence in education, scholarship and innovation, and their global applications, the International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) is a professional and educational association of scholars, educators, and students in the textile, apparel, and merchandising disciplines in higher education.

This site provides free, public access to the ITAA annual conference proceedings beginning in 2015. Previous proceedings can be found by following the "Additional ITAA Proceedings" link on the left sidebar of this page.

Department
Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying psychological process by which limited edition marketing of fashion goods impacts consumers' attitudes and behavioral intentions. An online experiment was conducted using Amazon Mechanical Turk. Fictitious scenarios reflecting two different levels of perceived competition (high and low) were carefully developed from pretest. Also, two different fashion products (sneakers and fast-fashion brand jackets designed by high-fashion designers) that are known to use limited-edition strategy frequently were used in the scenario. To test the hypotheses, t-test, simple regression and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. While the perceived competition increased the perceived popularity (β=.710, p<.05), the perceived competition had no influence on the perceived inequity (β=.103, p=.25). As predicted, the perceived popularity positively influenced the attitude (β=.469, p<.05), while the perceived inequity negatively influenced the attitude (β=.-439, p<.05). The attitude positively influenced the behavioral intentions (β=.706, p<.05).

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright