A comparison of SQUID imaging techniques for small defects in nonmagnetic tubes

Thumbnail Image
Date
1993
Authors
Hurley, D.
Ma, Y.
Tan, S.
Wikswo, J.
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Center for Nondestructive Evaluation

Begun in 1973, the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE) is the premier international NDE meeting designed to provide an interface between research and early engineering through the presentation of current ideas and results focused on facilitating a rapid transfer to engineering development.

This site provides free, public access to papers presented at the annual QNDE conference between 1983 and 1999, and abstracts for papers presented at the conference since 2001.

Department
Abstract

Although superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) provide an exquisitively sensitive means for measuring magnetic fields, their usage in the past has been limited chiefly to biomagnetic research. However, over the past few years interest in applying SQUID techniques to the field of nondestructive evaluation (NDE) has blossomed [1]. Many experiments have exploited the sensitivity of SQUIDs for diverse NDE applications, especially those requiring large separation distances between the sensor and the item to be inspected. Our work instead has focused on the potential to detect very small defects with SQUIDs, specifically in thin-walled tubes. In this paper, we discuss three different methods for creating magnetic fields in tubes. The methods comprise (a) directly injecting a current through the tube, (b) using a separate induction coil to create induced currents in the tube, and (c) utilizing a ferromagnetic tracer technique. To illustrate the capabilities of each method, we present two-dimensional maps of the spatial distribution of the magnetic field as measured by a SQUID magnetometer — that is, SQUID images. The images will also be used to compare the sensing methods with respect to such practical considerations as relative sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1993