Analysis of Multiple Sight Damage with Implications for Nondestructive Evaluation

Thumbnail Image
Date
1995
Authors
Buhler, Kimberley
Grandt, Alten
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Center for Nondestructive Evaluation

Begun in 1973, the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE) is the premier international NDE meeting designed to provide an interface between research and early engineering through the presentation of current ideas and results focused on facilitating a rapid transfer to engineering development.

This site provides free, public access to papers presented at the annual QNDE conference between 1983 and 1999, and abstracts for papers presented at the conference since 2001.

Department
Abstract

Multiple-Site Damage (MSD) in aging aircraft has motivated analysis of the fatigue life of a panel containing a row of cracked holes [1–3]. Given the initial MSD configuration and loading conditions, individual cracks are grown incrementally until link-up or the panel failes. First, stress intensity factors are calculated for all cracks. One crack tip is then assumed to advance a small amount, and the cycles for this increment of growth are calculated. The remaining cracks are then grown a distance corresponding to this cyclic interval by employing a fatigue crack growth model to relate the cyclic stress intensity factor and fatigue crack growth rate. After each incremental growth the current crack geometry is compared to one of several failure criteria [3] to determine whether the panel fails. For holes which are initially uncracked, cumulative damage is summed at these locations in conjunction with a Neuber notch analysis. When this strain-life analysis determines that “crack initiation” has occurred at a given hole, crack growth calculations continue at that location, and the routine is repeated until the failure criterion is satisfied.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1995