Qualification of Additive Manufacturing Flaw Fabrication Process for Verification of X-ray Computed Tomography of Complex Geometry Components

Thumbnail Image
Date
2016-01-01
Authors
Todorov, Evgueni
Jamshidinia, Mahdi
Kelly, Shawn
Newhouse, Scott
Urbanski, Jeffrey
Allison, Christopher
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Center for Nondestructive Evaluation

Begun in 1973, the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE) is the premier international NDE meeting designed to provide an interface between research and early engineering through the presentation of current ideas and results focused on facilitating a rapid transfer to engineering development.

This site provides free, public access to papers presented at the annual QNDE conference between 1983 and 1999, and abstracts for papers presented at the conference since 2001.

Department
Abstract

Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) techniques are needed to validate the additive manufacturing (AM) process performance. The lack of adequate NDE techniques for examination before, during and after AM component fabrication was identified as one of the main current challenges [1]. X-ray computed tomography (CT) was selected as primary technique for post-process inspection of components with complex shapes where the advantages of AM are fully realized [2]. To establish an initial baseline of CT data, Direct Metal Laser Melting (DMLM) and Electron Beam Melting (EBM) were used to fabricate coupons and complex geometry aerospace components with typical flaws and conditions. A flaw matrix was designed and the two processes were optimized to produce the desired flaws necessary for verification of CT performance in Inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-4V. Four coupon batches were fabricated. Surface and subsurface flaws were implanted such as pores, up to 135 AM process induced, and 8 machined artificial flaws. All four batches were CT inspected to measure the flaws and compare with the matrix to qualify the flaw fabrication process and determine the range of flaws that could reliably be produced. Coupons were sectioned to verify the CT measurements. CT data showed residual powder and differences between surface and subsurface flaw morphology. Results will be used in subsequent phases of the project to build and CT inspect components with complex shape and geometry for establishing CT baseline capabilities.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright