The economic and environmental impacts of livestock grazing in the United States under alternative soil-loss policies
Date
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 to teach economic theory as a truth of industrial life, and was very much concerned with applying economics to business and industry, particularly agriculture. Between 1910 and 1967 it showed the growing influence of other social studies, such as sociology, history, and political science. Today it encompasses the majors of Agricultural Business (preparing for agricultural finance and management), Business Economics, and Economics (for advanced studies in business or economics or for careers in financing, management, insurance, etc).
History
The Department of Economic Science was founded in 1898 under the Division of Industrial Science (later College of Liberal Arts and Sciences); it became co-directed by the Division of Agriculture in 1919. In 1910 it became the Department of Economics and Political Science. In 1913 it became the Department of Applied Economics and Social Science; in 1924 it became the Department of Economics, History, and Sociology; in 1931 it became the Department of Economics and Sociology. In 1967 it became the Department of Economics, and in 2007 it became co-directed by the Colleges of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Liberal Arts and Sciences, and Business.
Dates of Existence
1898–present
Historical Names
- Department of Economic Science (1898–1910)
- Department of Economics and Political Science (1910-1913)
- Department of Applied Economics and Social Science (1913–1924)
- Department of Economics, History and Sociology (1924–1931)
- Department of Economics and Sociology (1931–1967)
Related Units
- College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (parent college)
- College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (parent college)
- College of Business (parent college)
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract
The vast rangeland areas of the nation are becoming increasingly valuable to society. Economic progress, changes in society's needs, and varying roles among regions are influencing the relative importance of the nation's rangeland uses, its products and the environment. The general public has become concerned over range grazing and its associated environmental effects. This study analyzes the relationship of grazing to the soil erosion rate and the modifying effect of vegetation on this relationship. It also examines the interaction between the grazing sector and crop sector in the production of livestock feed;The linear programming model used in this study is national in scope, incorporating 28 market regions, 105 producing areas, and 106 potential natural plant communities (based on natural vegetation). This model is used to examine three solutions for the year 2000. The Base is an unconstrained soil loss solution and it is compared to the other two solutions. Once the Base is attained, producing area soil loss is restricted to 2T('1) and T('1) levels;The national and regional responses to the changing soil loss^levels are examined. Total land (including grazing land) used to^meet the projected demand levels declines as the allowed soil loss^declines, but irrigated cropland increases. Changes in range^management strategies are examined. The changes in the land^use, costs of production and transportation, investment cost on^rangeland, per unit cost of selected outputs are also examined.^The impacts of the soil loss reduction on yields and regional^distribution of production are analyzed. As the allowed soil loss^decreases, grazing management shifts from higher intensivestrategies to less intensive strategy in a region where acreagesgrazed are erosive and less productive. The study indicates thatthe agricultural industry as a whole and the society will gain long-;run benefits if soil loss is restricted;('1)T indicates Soil Loss Tolerance limit that allows the maximum rateof soil erosion without reducing the productivity of a given area.