Predicting the timing of marital dissolution for long-time married couples by dyadic variables
Date
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
The Department of Human Development and Family Studies focuses on the interactions among individuals, families, and their resources and environments throughout their lifespans. It consists of three majors: Child, Adult, and Family Services (preparing students to work for agencies serving children, youth, adults, and families); Family Finance, Housing, and Policy (preparing students for work as financial counselors, insurance agents, loan-officers, lobbyists, policy experts, etc); and Early Childhood Education (preparing students to teach and work with young children and their families).
History
The Department of Human Development and Family Studies was formed in 1991 from the merger of the Department of Family Environment and the Department of Child Development.
Dates of Existence
1991-present
Related Units
- College of Human Sciences (parent college)
- Department of Child Development (predecessor)
- Department of Family Environment (predecessor)
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract
Based on Pearlin and colleagues' Stress Process Theory and Levinger's social psychological perspective on marital dissolution, this study examines the chronic nature of certain dyadic properties of couples in determining the timing of marital dissolution. Three hundred and seven couples, who had been married for almost 20 years, participated in the Iowa Youth and Families Project and the Midlife Transitions Project. The results of the log-normal accelerated failure time model showed that a chronically high level of marital quality and commitment is beneficial, but a chronically high level of hostility is detrimental, to the survival of marriages. Dissatisfaction with the division of household labor also shortens the expected time to marital dissolution. Nevertheless, warmth/support and relative egalitarianism between spouses do not have noticeable effects as hypothesized. In addition, the findings regarding the relative income between spouses must be interpreted with caution. Future research may continue using couples as the unit of analysis. When considering the occurrence of marital dissolution, future research should take into account the time that couples experience divorce or separation.