Phosphorus indexing for cropland: Overview and basic concepts of the Iowa phosphorus index

Thumbnail Image
Date
2002-01-01
Authors
Mallarino, A. P.
Stewart, B. M.
Baker, J. L.
Downing, J. D.
Sawyer, J. E.
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Sawyer, John
Contingent Worker Contingent Worker Contingent Worker Contingent Worker Contingent Worker
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
AgronomyAnimal EcologyAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Abstract

Excessive phosphorus (P) loss from soils impairs surface water resources. An assessment tool or index has been proposed to identify fields with high potential risk of P delivery. The P index integrates P source and transport factors into a decision making process that may lead to changes in current P management and soil conservation practices. The index recognizes that a single soil P threshold alone is not an appropriate evaluation factor because of the varying conditions across fields. Although most indices being developed in the United States include similar factors, source and transport characteristics are considered in various ways to best address the variable conditions across regions. The Iowa P index reflects conditions that predominate under grain-crop production systems, considers source factors in a multiplicative manner within three main transport mechanisms, and approximates loads of P likely to enter and become available to aquatic ecosystems. An erosional component considers sheet and rill erosion, P enrichment, total soil P, buffers, sediment delivery, distance to a stream, and the long term biotic availability of particulate P in lake ecosystems. A runoff component considers water runoff based on a modification of the runoff curve number (RCN), soil-test P (STP), rate, time, and method of P application. An internal drainage component considers the presence of tiles, water flow to tile lines, subsurface recharge from subsurface flow, and soil-test P. When the erosion risk is high, the index weighs particulate P loss heavily compared with dissolved P loss, and emphasizes long-term processes comparatively more than short-term processes. This P assessment tool helps identify alternative P and soil conservation management options for reducing total P delivery from fields to surface water resources.

Comments

This article is from Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 57 (2002): 440.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Collections