Joint analysis of the Berkshire x Yorkshire and Berkshire x Duroc crosses for QTL detection
Date
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
The Department of Animal Science originally concerned itself with teaching the selection, breeding, feeding and care of livestock. Today it continues this study of the symbiotic relationship between animals and humans, with practical focuses on agribusiness, science, and animal management.
History
The Department of Animal Husbandry was established in 1898. The name of the department was changed to the Department of Animal Science in 1962. The Department of Poultry Science was merged into the department in 1971.
Historical Names
- Department of Animal Husbandry (1898–1962)
- College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (parent college)
- Department of Poultry Science (merged with, 1971)
Related Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract
Over the past decade, several resource populations have been established to detect QTL for traits of economic importance in pigs using breed crosses. Although each population allows independent identification of QTL, each population is often of limited size, which restricts the statistical power and accuracy of QTL identification. A joint analysis of data from multiple projects, which is what will be described here for the Berkshire x Yorkshire cross population at Iowa State University and the Berkshire x Duroc cross population at the University of Illinois, will allow more accurate identification of QTL.
A joint analysis of data from seven F2 crosses from six countries was recently completed by Walling et al. (2000). All crosses were based on a Western commercial breed crossed with either Meishan or European Wild Boar. Data from the three traits that were most similar across populations (birth weight, growth, and backfat) were analyzed to detect QTL on SSC4 using a breed-cross model. Despite considerable differences in the breeds, markers, and traits, this study clearly shows that a joint analysis is feasible and allows for combining the limited power of individual studies. Joint analysis also allows testing additional hypotheses, such as whether QTL from different populations are identical.
Comments
This proceeding was published as Kim, J.‐J., J. Dekkers, S. Rodriguez‐Zas, J. Beever, and M. Rothschild. 2003. Joint analysis of the Berkshire x Yorkshire and Berkshire x Duroc crosses for QTL detection. Proc. 28th National Swine Improvement Federation Meeting, Des Moines, IA, Dec. 4‐5. Posted with permission.