Using Social Network Analysis to Measure Student Collaboration in an Undergraduate Capstone Course
Date
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
The Department of Agricultural Education and Studies was formed in 1989 as a result of the merger of the Department of Agricultural Education with the Department of Agricultural Studies. Its focus includes two these fields: agricultural education leading to teacher-certification or outreach communication; and agricultural studies leading to production agriculture or other agricultural industries.
History
The Department of Agricultural Education and Studies was formed in 1989 from the merger of the Department of Agricultural Education and the Department of Agricultural Studies.
Dates of Existence
1989–present
Related Units
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (parent college)
- Department of Agricultural Education (predecessor, 1911–1989)
- Department of Agricultural Studies (predecessor)
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract
Social network analysis offers a unique way for instructors to visualize collaboration and communication within a course and see relationships between individu¬als, groups, teams, or cliques. We used social network analysis to measure the growth of collaboration in the capstone AGEDS 450 Farm Management and Oper¬ation course at Iowa State University. With the strate-gic implementation of collaboratively intense assign¬ments, student collaboration grew from the midpoint of the semester to the end of the semester. Overall density of the network increased from 0.25 at the midpoint to 0.35 at the end of the semester (40% growth). Each stu¬dent’s number of communication ties increased over the course of the semester to 17.2. Average geodesic dis¬tance between nodes decreased 11.7% from the mid¬point to the end of the semester, resulting in an average pathway length of 1.66 to connect any two students; this improved communication efficiency in the course. No cutpoint existed at the midpoint or the end of semester, showing no risk of collapse in the network. The overall network became more complex, indicating a more inclu¬sive collaborative environment. We recommend that instructors include structured activities that emphasize student collaboration to help develop strong information networks in other courses.
Comments
This is an article from NACTA Journal 60 (2016): 176. Posted with permission.