Personality Similarity in Negotiations: Testing the Dyadic Effects of Similarity in Interpersonal Traits and the Use of Emotional Displays on Negotiation Outcomes.

Thumbnail Image
Supplemental Files
Date
2016-06-23
Authors
Wilson, Kelly
DeRue, D. Scott
Matta, Fadel
Howe, Michael
Conlon, Donald
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Howe, Michael
Associate Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Management and Entrepreneurship

The Department of Management and Entrepreneurship seeks to provide students with the knowledge of organizations and management functions within organizations. Graduates will be able to understand work-related behavior, competitive strategy and advantage, strategies of international business, and human-resource management practices.

History
The Department of Management was formed in 1984 in the College of Business Administration (later College of Business).

Dates of Existence
1984 - present

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Management and Entrepreneurship
Abstract

We build on the small but growing literature documenting personality influences on negotiation by examining how the joint disposition of both negotiators with respect to the interpersonal traits of agreeableness and extraversion influences important negotiation processes and outcomes. Building on similarity-attraction theory, we articulate and demonstrate how being similarly high or similarly low on agreeableness and extraversion leads dyad members to express more positive emotional displays during negotiation. Moreover, because of increased positive emotional displays, we show that dyads with such compositions also tend to reach agreements faster, perceive less relationship conflict, and have more positive impressions of their negotiation partner. Interestingly, these results hold regardless of whether negotiating dyads are similar in normatively positive (i.e., similarly agreeable and similarly extraverted) or normatively negative (i.e., similarly disagreeable and similarly introverted) ways. Overall, these findings demonstrate the importance of considering the dyad's personality configuration when attempting to understand the affective experience as well as the downstream outcomes of a negotiation.

Comments

This is a manuscript of an article from Journal of Applied Psychology, June 2016. Doi: 10.1037/apl0000132. Posted with permission. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Fri Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2016
Collections