Reconnecting Tile Drainage to Riparian Buffer Hydrology for Enhanced Nitrate Removal

Thumbnail Image
Date
2014-03-01
Authors
Jaynes, Dan
Isenhart, Thomas
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Isenhart, Thomas
Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Natural Resource Ecology and Management
Abstract

Riparian buffers are a proven practice for removing NO3 from overland flow and shallow groundwater. However, in landscapes with artificial subsurface (tile) drainage, most of the subsurface flow leaving fields is passed through the buffers in drainage pipes, leaving little opportunity for NO3 removal. We investigated the feasibility of re-routing a fraction of field tile drainage as subsurface flow through a riparian buffer for increasing NO3 removal. We intercepted an existing field tile outlet draining a 10.1-ha area of a row-cropped field in central Iowa and re-routed a fraction of the discharge as subsurface flow along 335 m of an existing riparian buffer. Tile drainage from the field was infiltrated through a perforated pipe installed 75 cm below the surface by maintaining a constant head in the pipe at a control box installed in-line with the existing field outlet. During 2 yr, >18,000 m3 (55%) of the total flow from the tile outlet was redirected as infiltration within the riparian buffer. The redirected water seeped through the 60-m-wide buffer, raising the water table approximately 35 cm. The redirected tile flow contained 228 kg of NO3. On the basis of the strong decrease in NO3concentrations within the shallow groundwater across the buffer, we hypothesize that the NO3 did not enter the stream but was removed within the buffer by plant uptake, microbial immobilization, or denitrification. Redirecting tile drainage as subsurface flow through a riparian buffer increased its NO3 removal benefit and is a promising management practice to improve surface water quality within tile-drained landscapes.

Comments

This article is from Journal of Environmental Quality 43 (2014): 631, doi:10.2134/jeq2013.08.0331.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Collections