Soil sampling for nitrate in late spring
Date
Authors
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
The Department of Agronomy seeks to teach the study of the farm-field, its crops, and its science and management. It originally consisted of three sub-departments to do this: Soils, Farm-Crops, and Agricultural Engineering (which became its own department in 1907). Today, the department teaches crop sciences and breeding, soil sciences, meteorology, agroecology, and biotechnology.
History
The Department of Agronomy was formed in 1902. From 1917 to 1935 it was known as the Department of Farm Crops and Soils.
Dates of Existence
1902–present
Historical Names
- Department of Farm Crops and Soils (1917–1935)
Related Units
- College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (parent college)
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Abstract
Soil sampling for nitrate in late spring when corn plants are 15 to 30 cm tall can be used to obtain information needed for site-specific management of N during corn production. However, variability in soil nitrate concentrations causes sampling problems when using the test to assess N availability. Although variability of soil nitrate concentrations has been studied, there is a lack of information on the uncertainty associated with assessment of nitrate concentrations for small research-sized plots. Also, few studies have been conducted to develop guidelines for efficient sampling of fields for soil nitrate in late spring. Knowledge of the variability of nitrate concentrations within and among small areas of seemingly uniform soil within a field is essential for site-specific management of N;Studies were conducted to learn more about the variability of nitrate concentrations within small plots of seemingly uniform soil and variability among these small plots within a field. Results from these studies show that there is a high degree of uncertainty associated with the determinations of nitrate concentrations from samples collected from small plots of seemingly uniform soil. Such uncertainties must be considered whenever soil nitrate results are interpreted. This problem, however, can be minimized by collecting several samples, looking for trends established by most samples, and giving little credence to samples that do not follow the observed trends. The results also show that much of the within-field variability in nitrate concentrations can be explained by differences in Kjeldahl N concentrations. These findings suggest that within-field differences in soil organic matter concentrations, which are correlated with Kjeldahl N concentrations, offer a practical way to divide fields into 'sites' for soil nitrate testing. This is helpful because differences in organic matter contents can be visually identified when soil samples are collected.