Breadth of the thermal response captures individual and geographic variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination

Thumbnail Image
Date
2019-08-05
Authors
Carter, Anna
Bodensteiner, Brooke
Iverson, John
Milne-Zelman, Carrie
Mitchell, Timothy
Refsnider, Jeanine
Warner, Daniel
Janzen, Fredric
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Janzen, Fredric
Professor Emeritus
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology

The Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology seeks to teach the studies of ecology (organisms and their environment), evolutionary theory (the origin and interrelationships of organisms), and organismal biology (the structure, function, and biodiversity of organisms). In doing this, it offers several majors which are codirected with other departments, including biology, genetics, and environmental sciences.

History
The Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology was founded in 2003 as a merger of the Department of Botany, the Department of Microbiology, and the Department of Zoology and Genetics.

Dates of Existence
2003–present

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology
Abstract

  1. Population‐scale responses of key ecological traits to local environmental conditions provide insight into their adaptive potential. In species with temperature‐dependent sex determination (TSD), short‐term, individual developmental responses to the incubation environment have long‐term consequences for populations.
  2. We took a model‐based approach to study within‐ and among‐population variation in the physiological components of TSD in 12 populations of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta). We used laboratory and field incubation data to quantify variation in thermal reaction norms at both population and clutch scales, focusing on the pivotal temperature that produces a 1:1 sex ratio (P) and the transitional range of incubation temperatures (TRTs) that produce mixed sex ratios.
  3. Defying theoretical expectations, among‐population variation in P was not convincingly explained by geography or local thermal conditions. However, within some populations, P varied by >5°C at the clutch scale, indicating that the temperature sensitivity of gonadal differentiation can vary substantially among individual nesting females. In addition, the TRT was wider at lower latitudes, suggesting responsiveness to local incubation conditions.
  4. Our results provide a potential explanation for discrepancies observed between constant‐temperature experimental results and outcomes of fluctuating incubation conditions experienced in natural nests, exposing important knowledge gaps in our understanding of local adaptation in TSD and identifying shortcomings of traditional laboratory studies. Understanding individual variation and the timing of gonadal differentiation is likely to be far more useful in understanding local adaptation than previously acknowledged.

Comments

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Carter, Anna L., Brooke L. Bodensteiner, John B. Iverson, Carrie L. Milne‐Zelman, Timothy S. Mitchell, Jeanine M. Refsnider, Daniel A. Warner, and Fredric J. Janzen. "Breadth of the thermal response captures individual and geographic variation in temperature‐dependent sex determination." Functional Ecology (2019), which has been published in final form at doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.13410. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2019
Collections