Negotiating technologies and social action on the prairie: visual, verbal, and spatial rhetorics in the narrative of a public, interpretive exhibition

Thumbnail Image
Date
2003-01-01
Authors
Booker, Susan
Major Professor
Advisor
Charles J. Kostelnick
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
English

The Department of English seeks to provide all university students with the skills of effective communication and critical thinking, as well as imparting knowledge of literature, creative writing, linguistics, speech and technical communication to students within and outside of the department.

History
The Department of English and Speech was formed in 1939 from the merger of the Department of English and the Department of Public Speaking. In 1971 its name changed to the Department of English.

Dates of Existence
1939-present

Historical Names

  • Department of English and Speech (1939-1971)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
English
Abstract

This qualitative case study of a public, interpretive museum space examines the visual, verbal, and spatial rhetorics of the exhibition's educational narrative. The site, a national wildlife refuge and accompanying visitors' center, features research and environmental education on the restoration and preservation of tallgrass prairie and oak savanna ecosystems. The study draws on theory and practice of contemporary museums engaged in professional communication about the environment and engages cultural studies' articulation theory in its approach. Conventional qualitative methods of interviews, document analysis, and observation are employed. Five types of data were analyzed: documents (including newspaper articles, consultants' reports and correspondence, and promotional information from the refuge and prairie learning center); interviews; signage (both exterior and interior); displays as part of the exhibition's narrative; and video and web-based materials. The study argues that the visual, verbal, and spatial narratives present at the refuge and learning center challenge prevailing assumptions about land use and participation with the environment and calls on visitors to engage deeply in the progressive environmental work of the refuge. Such engagement with nature and such understanding of how museums function in communities gets redefined at this site. A series of tensions in the exhibition's narrative serve as the primary units of data analysis: wild and tame; technology and Nature; heritage and progress; hidden or understated and revealed or promoted; constructed or controlled and natural or free; and stated or articulated and assumed or ignored. The study concludes that museums as rhetorical and political spaces reshape perceptions of knowledge-making and community, that museums provide innovate sites for education and social action, and that the tensions that exist in such spaces need not be reconciled and, in fact, may be necessary in order to intervene in the arguments that are constructed around technical concepts for various audiences.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2003