What makes an effective press release: a coorientation approach of public relations practitioners and news editors in sport

Thumbnail Image
Date
2006-01-01
Authors
Janecek, Joel
Major Professor
Advisor
Suman Lee
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication
The Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication offers two majors: Advertising (instructing students in applied communication for work in business or industry), and Journalism and Mass Communication (instructing students in various aspects of news and information organizing, writing, editing, and presentation on various topics and in various platforms). The Department of Agricultural Journalism was formed in 1905 in the Division of Agriculture. In 1925 its name was changed to the Department of Technical Journalism. In 1969 its name changed to the Department of Journalism and Mass Communications; from 1969 to 1989 the department was directed by all four colleges, and in 1989 was placed under the direction of the College of Sciences and Humanities (later College of Liberal Arts and Sciences). In 1998 its name was changed to the Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication
Abstract

This study explores relationships between public relations practitioners in sport and sport news editors. As a viable communications method used by both public relations practitioners and sport news editors, the press release was examined using the communication theory of coorientation. The study used individual press release elements as coorientational objects. Seventy-five public relations practitioners, in this case Sports Information Directors at NCAA Division I institutions, and forty-four sports news editors who cover college athletics participated in an email survey. Research questions were tested on the relationships between agreement and accuracy as it pertained to the various press release elements proposed. Findings indicated that while some press release elements are in fact agreed upon, the two professional groups take an ''agree to disagree'' approach regarding other press release elements. Accuracy of the perceptions of each of the professional groups was quite low likely due to negative preconceived notions regarding the other. In short, both professional groups have inaccurate views of the others estimates of what are needed elements of a successful press release. Practical applications as well as suggestions for future study are discussed.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2006