Characterizing an automation level-based safety assessment tool to improve fluency in safe human cobot interaction

Thumbnail Image
Date
2021-01-01
Authors
Pujari, Shamika
Major Professor
Dr. Richard Stone
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering
The Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering teaches the design, analysis, and improvement of the systems and processes in manufacturing, consulting, and service industries by application of the principles of engineering. The Department of General Engineering was formed in 1929. In 1956 its name changed to Department of Industrial Engineering. In 1989 its name changed to the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering
Abstract

In the current manufacturing era of advanced automation, cobots, and robots play an integral role in any manufacturing operation. Collaborative robots can share a workspace with humans to carry out day to day operations with safety. Although there are a lot of studies in the field of industrial-size robots and cobots and their programs or algorithms to make them safer, faster, efficient, the number of OSHA reported accidents due to cobots and robots has not decreased. Even though these cobots are considered inherently safe, they open more probability for accidents because they are not caged. Therefore, it is necessary for the manufacturing industries using cobots to consider the risk involved in human cobot interaction and the ways to attain safety and lower the risk of injury before installing cobots on assembly lines. This study has developed a lightweight cobot and a user-centric tool to perform a physical and psychological risk assessment using process- failure mode effect analysis (PFMEA) for different automation levels in human cobot interaction. A detailed analysis involving stratification of potential failure modes, their types, causes and effects are discussed, and the failure modes or safety incidents are then ranked based on severity, occurrence and detection. The study also tries to correlate the respiratory rate or heart rate and stress involved in human cobot interaction to improve fluency in assembly operation. The developed assessment tool generates a quantitative as well as qualitative assessment consisting of RPN and CN scores. It suggests recommended actions and various CAPA options to curtail physical injury. The tool also offers different training modules for the operators based on their perception of safety and the stress level involved in the assembly operation to reduce behavioral risks. Thus, the generated results provide insights about safety analysis that can be used by manufacturers to improve safe human cobot interaction.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2020