Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
2009
Journal or Book Title
AIP Conference Proceedings
Volume
1113
First Page
63
Last Page
67
DOI
10.1063/1.3131472
Abstract
High‐intensity, focused ultrasound therapy is a minimally invasive therapy technique that is effective and relatively safe. It can be used in areas including histotripsy, thermal ablation, and administering medication. Inertial cavitation is used to improve these therapy methods. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of pressure amplitude on cavitation resonance frequency/bubble size at therapeutic field levels. Earlier work has indicated that the resonance size depends on pressure amplitude; however, the investigation only considered pressure amplitudes up to 1 MPa [1]. Our study was conducted by simulating the response of bubbles to linearly propagating sine waves using the Gilmore‐Akulichev formulation to solve for the bubble response. The frequency of the sine wave varied from 1 to 5 MHz while the amplitude of the sine wave varied from 0.0001 to 9 MPa. The resonance size for a particular frequency of excitation and amplitude was determined by finding the initial bubble size that resulted in the maximum bubble expansion for an air bubble in water. The simulations demonstrated a downshift in resonance size with increasing pressure amplitude. Therefore, smaller bubbles will have a more dramatic response to ultrasound at therapeutic levels.
Rights
Copyright 2009 American Institute of Physics. This article may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the author and the American Institute of Physics.
Copyright Owner
American Institute of Physics
Copyright Date
2009
Language
en
File Format
application/pdf
Recommended Citation
Carvell, Kelsey Jean and Bigelow, Timothy A., "Dependence of Cavitation Bubble Size on Pressure Amplitude at Therapeutic Levels" (2009). Electrical and Computer Engineering Publications. 47.
https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ece_pubs/47
Comments
The following article appeared in AIP Conference Proceedings 1113 (2009): 63 and may be found at doi:10.1063/1.3131472.