Discussion of U.S. Domestic Policy and U.S.-E.C. Trade

Thumbnail Image
Supplemental Files
Date
1994
Authors
Moschini, Giancarlo
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Moschini, Giancarlo
Distinguished Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Economics
Abstract

I would like to congratulate Bruce Gardner for providing a thorough and lucid presentation of the main features of U.S. agricultural policies that affect agricultural trade. His main conclusion is that U.S. commodity programs no longer increase U.S. output; if anything, they result in less U.S. output for some major commodities. Thus, the implications of these policies for trading partners such as the Economic Community (E.C.) should be reassuring. Furthermore, Gardner notes that: (1) the income of U.S. farmers no longer provides a rationale for agricultural price support because farmers have become relatively prosperous; (2) there is continuous political pressure to reduce government spending; and, (3) emerging environmental concerns may further constrain agricultural output growth. All of this reinforces his main conclusion: The tendency of (current) U.S. agricultural support policies to decrease output is very likely to persist in the future. I find myself in substantial agreement with the theses pre­ sented in this chapter. I only have minor qualifications, which I would like to discuss briefly.

Comments

This is a discussion of "U.S. Domestic Policy and U.S.-E.C. Trade" from Agricultural Trade Conflicts and GATT: New Dimensions in U.S.-European Agricultural Trade Relations (1994): 97. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Copyright
Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1994
Collections