A Comparison of Alternative Procedures for Resolving Indeterminacies in the Theory of Reasoned Action

Thumbnail Image
Supplemental Files
Date
1997
Authors
Sapp, Stephen
Jensen, Helen
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Jensen, Helen
Professor Emeritus
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Organizational Unit
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
EconomicsSociology
Abstract

Five suggested alternatives for resolving indeterminacies in the theory of reasoned action resulting from ill-formed intentions were examined for their ability to predict Japanese consumer intentions to eat U.S. beef. Assessment relied upon structural equation analysis of data collected from 594 respondents in a nationwide survey of Japanese beef consumers. The alternative that incorporated product characteristics associated with the diffusion of innovations model provided the best fit to the data and the best prediction of intentions. Implications are suggested for procedures for resolving attitude- and subjective norm-intention indeterminacies in the theory of reasoned action.

Comments

This is an article from Social Behavior and Personality 25 (1997): 305, doi: 10.2224/sbp.1997.25.4.305. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1997
Collections