Campus Units

English

Document Type

Article

Publication Version

Submitted Manuscript

Publication Date

2015

Journal or Book Title

Language Testing

Volume

32

Issue

3

First Page

385

Last Page

405

DOI

10.1177/0265532214565386

Abstract

Two examples demonstrate an argument-based approach to validation of diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation (AWE). Criterion ®, was developed by Educational Testing Service to analyze students’ papers grammatically, providing sentence-level error feedback. An interpretive argument was developed for its use as part of the diagnostic assessment process in undergraduate university English for academic purposes (EAP) classes. The Intelligent Academic Discourse Evaluator (IADE) was developed for use in graduate EAP university classes, where the goal was to help students improve their discipline-specific writing. The validation for each was designed to support claims about the intended purposes of the assessments. We present the interpretive argument for each and show some of the data that have been gathered as backing for the respective validity arguments, which include the range of inferences that one would make in claiming validity of the interpretations, uses, and consequences of diagnostic AWE-based assessments.

Comments

This is a manuscript of an article from Language Testing 32 (2015): 385, doi: 10.1177/0265532214565386. Posted with permission.

Copyright Owner

The Authors

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Published Version

Share

COinS