Campus Units

English

Document Type

Article

Publication Version

Published Version

Publication Date

2007

Journal or Book Title

Informal Logic

Volume

27

Issue

1

First Page

69

Last Page

90

Abstract

Douglas Walton has been right in calling us to attend to the pragmatics of argument. He has, however, also insisted that arguments should be understood and assessed by considering the functions they perform; and from this, I dissent. Argument has no determinable function in the sense Walton needs, and even if it did, that function would not ground norms for argumentative practice. As an alternative to a functional theory of argumentative pragmatics, I propose a design view, which draws attention to the way participants strategically undertake and impose norms on themselves in order for their arguments to have force.

Comments

This article is from Informal Logic Vol. 27, No. 1 (2007): pp. 69-90. Posted with permission.

Copyright Owner

Informal Logic

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Included in

Rhetoric Commons

Share

COinS