Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-liquids production based on gasification

Thumbnail Image
Date
2009-01-01
Authors
Swanson, Ryan
Major Professor
Advisor
Robert C. Brown
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Mechanical Engineering
The Department of Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University is where innovation thrives and the impossible is made possible. This is where your passion for problem-solving and hands-on learning can make a real difference in our world. Whether you’re helping improve the environment, creating safer automobiles, or advancing medical technologies, and athletic performance, the Department of Mechanical Engineering gives you the tools and talent to blaze your own trail to an amazing career.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Mechanical Engineering
Abstract

This study compares capital and production costs of two biomass-to-liquid production plants based on gasification. The goal is to produce liquid transportation fuels via Fischer-Tropsch synthesis with electricity as co-product. The biorefineries are fed by 2000 metric tons per day of corn stover. The first biorefinery scenario is an oxygen-fed, low temperature (870yC), non-slagging, fluidized bed gasifier and the second scenario an oxygen-fed, high temperature (1300yC), slagging, entrained flow gasifier. Both are followed by catalytic Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and hydroprocessing to naphtha and distillate liquid fractions.

Process modeling software is utilized to organize the mass and energy streams and cost estimation software is used to generate equipment costs. Economic analysis is performed to estimate the capital investment and operating costs. A 20 year discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR) analysis is developed to estimate a fuel product value (PV) at a net present value of zero with 10% internal rate of return. All costs are adjusted to the year 2007.

Results show that the total capital investment required for nth plant scenarios are $610 million and $500 million, for high temperature and low temperature scenarios, respectively. PV for the high temperature and low temperature scenarios are estimated to be $4.30 and $4.80 per gallon of gasoline equivalent (GGE), respectively. The main reason for a difference in PV between the scenarios is because of a higher carbon efficiency and subsequent higher fuel yield for the high temperature scenario. Sensitivity analysis is also performed on process and economic parameters which shows that total capital investment and feedstock cost are among the most influential parameters affecting the PV while least influential parameters include per pass Fischer-Tropsch reaction conversion extent, inlet feedstock moisture, and catalyst cost.

In order to estimate the cost of a pioneer plant (1st of its kind) an analysis is performed which inflates total capital investment and deflates the plant output for the first several years of operation. Base case results of this analysis estimate a pioneer plant investment to be $1.3 billion and $1.0 billion for high temperature and low temperature scenarios, respectively. Resulting respective PV are estimated to be $7.40 and $7.70 per GGE for pioneer plant.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Subject Categories
Copyright
Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2009