#### Degree Type

Dissertation

#### Date of Award

2012

#### Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy

#### Department

Statistics

#### First Advisor

Philip M. Dixon

#### Abstract

This dissertation addresses two separate issues involving the estimation of risk. The first issue regards the creation of a schedule for the viability testing of seeds stored in long-term storage facilities. The second problem pertains to the time required to simulate risk by using a two-dimensional Monte Carlo.

Genebank managers conduct viability tests on stored seeds so they can replace lots that have viability near a critical threshold, such as 50 or 85 % germination. Currently, these tests are typically scheduled at uniform intervals; testing every 5 years is common. A manager needs to balance the cost of an additional test against the possibility of losing a seed lot due to late retesting. We developed a data-informed method to schedule viability tests for a collection of 2,833 maize seed lots with 3 to 7 completed viability tests per lot. Given these historical data reporting on seed viability at arbitrary times, we fit a hierarchical Bayesian seed-viability model with random seed-lot-specific coefficients. The posterior distribution of the predicted time to cross below a critical threshold was estimated for each seed lot. We recommend a predicted quantile as a retest time, chosen to balance the importance of catching quickly decaying lots against the cost of premature tests. The method can be used with any seed-viability model; we focused on two, the Avrami viability curve and a quadratic curve that accounts for seed after-ripening. After fitting both models, we found that the quadratic curve gave more plausible predictions than did the Avrami curve. Also, a receiver operating characteristic (*ROC*) curve analysis and a follow-up test demonstrated that a 0.05 quantile yields reasonable predictions.

The two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation is an important tool for quantitative risk assessors. Its framework easily propagates aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties related to risk. Aleatoric uncertainty concerns the inherent, irreducible variability of a risk factor. Epistemic uncertainty concerns the reducible uncertainty of a fixed risk factor. The total crop yield of a corn field is an example of an aleatoric uncertainty while the mean of corn yield is an epistemic uncertainty. The traditional application of a two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation in a risk assessment requires many Monte Carlo samples. In a common case, a risk assessor samples 10,000 epistemic factor vectors. For each vector, the assessor generates 10,000 vectors of aleatoric factors and calculates risk. The purpose of heavy aleatoric simulation is to estimate a cumulative frequency distribution, *CDF*, of risk conditional on an epistemic vector. This approach has 10^{8} calculations of risk and is computationally slow. We propose a more efficient method that reduces the number of simulations in the aleatoric dimension by pooling together risk values of epistemic vectors close to a target epistemic vector and estimate the conditional *CDF* using the multivariate Nadaraya-Watson estimator. We examine the risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome in young children exposed to *Escherichia coli* O157:H7 in frozen ground beef patties and demonstrate that our method replicates the results of the traditional two-dimensional Monte Carlo risk assessment. Furthermore, for this problem, we find that our method is three times faster than the traditional method.

In order to perform the modified two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation of risk, we must specify a bandwidth, *h*. In general, researchers pick an *h* that balances the estimator's bias and variance. They minimize criteria such as average squared error (*ASE*), penalized *ASE*, or asymptotic mean integrated squared error (*AMISE*) to select an "optimal" *h*. A review of the optimal bandwidth selection literature related to multivariate kernel-regression estimation shows that there is still ambiguity about the best bandwidth selector. We compare the effects of five penalized-*ASE* bandwidth selectors and an *AMISE* bandwidth plug-in on the average accuracy of a multivariate Nadaraya-Watson kernel-regression estimator of a *CDF* of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) risk in young children exposed to *Escherichia coli* O157:H7 in ground beef patties. We consider these six bandwidth selectors because they compute relative quickly, and researchers generally desire fast results. Simulating different amounts of data (*n _{e}* = 1000, 3000, and 5000) from each of three HUS-risk models of varying complexity, we find that none of the selectors consistently results in the most accurate

*CDF*estimator. However, if the goal is to produce accurate quantile-quantile risk assessment results (Pouillot and Delignette-Muller (2010)), then the

*AMISE*-based selector performs best.

#### Copyright Owner

Allan Francis Trapp II

#### Copyright Date

2012

#### Language

en

#### File Format

application/pdf

#### File Size

93 pages

#### Recommended Citation

Trapp II, Allan Francis, "Applications of Non-Parametric Kernel Smoothing Estimators in Monte Carlo Risk Assessments" (2012). *Graduate Theses and Dissertations*. 12776.

https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12776

#### Included in

Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Public Health Education and Promotion Commons, Statistics and Probability Commons