Evaluating the potential roles of body dissatisfaction in exercise avoidance

Thumbnail Image
Date
2017-01-01
Authors
More, Kimberly
Major Professor
Advisor
L. A. Phillips
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Psychology
The Department of Psychology may prepare students with a liberal study, or for work in academia or professional education for law or health-services. Graduates will be able to apply the scientific method to human behavior and mental processes, as well as have ample knowledge of psychological theory and method.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Psychology
Abstract

Body dissatisfaction is experienced by individuals in all weight classes and has been linked with poor mental and physical health outcomes in both women and men. Exercise interventions are a common tool used to improve body dissatisfaction, but their impact is relatively small. Reasons for this small impact might include high rates of attrition and difficulty in recruiting those who are most sedentary in the first place, or who avoid exercise (at most high-risk/high-need). The present study evaluates the extent to which exercise avoidance mediates the association of body dissatisfaction with exercise frequency and whether perceived embarrassment, exercise fatigue, and exercise self-efficacy explain the association of body dissatisfaction with exercise avoidance. Participants were 110 students and staff from an urban, private US university. Body dissatisfaction, exercise avoidance, and hypothesized mediators were measured at baseline; objective exercise was measured with accelerometers for one month. Exercise avoidance mediated the relation between body dissatisfaction and exercise frequency (B = -.02 (SE =.01) [95% CI: -.04 to -.01]). Additionally, the relation between body dissatisfaction and exercise avoidance was fully mediated by embarrassment (B = .24 (SE .10) [95% CI: .08 to .47])and fatigue (B = .10 (SE .06) [95% CI: .01 to .28]) but not by self-efficacy (B = -.00 (SE .02) [95% CI: -.06 to .01]). Thus, exercise interventions may not effectively target individuals who are dissatisfied with their body because they may be avoiding exercise due to perceived embarrassment and fatigue.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Subject Categories
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2017