Active air spring control as a method of agricultural sprayer boom system suspension

Thumbnail Image
Date
2020-01-01
Authors
Blaylock, Kyle
Major Professor
Advisor
Matthew Darr
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering

Since 1905, the Department of Agricultural Engineering, now the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ABE), has been a leader in providing engineering solutions to agricultural problems in the United States and the world. The department’s original mission was to mechanize agriculture. That mission has evolved to encompass a global view of the entire food production system–the wise management of natural resources in the production, processing, storage, handling, and use of food fiber and other biological products.

History
In 1905 Agricultural Engineering was recognized as a subdivision of the Department of Agronomy, and in 1907 it was recognized as a unique department. It was renamed the Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering in 1990. The department merged with the Department of Industrial Education and Technology in 2004.

Dates of Existence
1905–present

Historical Names

  • Department of Agricultural Engineering (1907–1990)

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Abstract

Self-propelled sprayers have become commonplace in controlling pests and weeds in agricultural production. As technology has advanced, boom height control systems have allowed for more precise application of pesticides by improving the consistency of the spray nozzle height relative to the ground. Most agricultural sprayers use mechanical springs and passive dampers as a suspension between the fixed center frame and the suspended center frame of the sprayer, which improves the natural rejection of machine dynamics into the boom.

In this work, adjustable air springs were installed in place of traditional mechanical springs as a means of suspension between the chassis and boom system. These air springs were optimized for both in-field operation and a turning event. Control logic was developed to actively control the air springs during machine operation. A case study was carried out to determine the effectiveness of the active air spring control system with regard to boom height performance.

Performance metrics were calculated for the baseline and active control test sets and it was determined that the turning event control logic significantly improved boom height performance. Based on the data collected for this study, there appears to be an opportunity for improvement in boom height control performance with active air spring control as a means of suspension of the boom system. More research should be conducted to identify more events when the active air spring control system could be utilized to improve boom height control.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Fri May 01 00:00:00 UTC 2020