Diagnostic utility of caudal vena cava measurements in dogs with cavitary effusions or heart failure

Thumbnail Image
Date
2020-01-01
Authors
Chou, Yen-Yu
Major Professor
Advisor
Jessica L. Ward
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Altmetrics
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Veterinary Clinical Sciences
The mission of the Veterinary Clinical Sciences Department and the Veterinary Medical Center is to be strong academically, to provide outstanding services, and to conduct research in the multiple areas of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. Our goals are to teach students in the multiple disciplines of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, to provide excellent veterinary services to clients, and to generate and disseminate new knowledge in the areas of Veterinary Clinical Sciences. Our objectives are to provide a curriculum in the various aspects of Veterinary Clinical Sciences which ensures students acquire the skills and knowledge to be successful in their chosen careers. We also strive to maintain a caseload of sufficient size and diversity which insures a broad clinical experience for students, residents, and faculty. In addition, we aim to provide clinical veterinary services of the highest standards to animal owners and to referring veterinarians. And finally, we strive to provide an environment and opportunities which foster and encourage the generation and dissemination of new knowledge in many of the disciplines of Veterinary Clinical Sciences.
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Veterinary Clinical Sciences
Abstract

Thoracic ultrasound has proven effective for the diagnosis of left-sided congestive heart failure (L-CHF) dogs and cats with respiratory distress. The objective of this study was to determine whether ultrasonographic indices of the caudal vena cava (CVC) could be used to diagnose right-sided CHF (R-CHF) in dogs with cavitary effusions.

Dogs were prospectively enrolled in four groups: R-CHF (n = 34), L-CHF (39), cavitary effusions of noncardiac etiology (NC, 41), and pericardial effusion with tamponade (PCEFF, 17). Ultrasonographic indices included right ventricular to left ventricular ratio (RV:LV) and 2D and M-mode subxiphoid measures of CVC maximal and minimal size (CVCmax and CVCmin), CVCmax indexed to aortic dimension (CVC:Ao), and CVC collapsibility index (CVC-CI). Variables were compared between study groups using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's-Bonferroni testing.

All indices (RV:LV, CVCmax, CVCmin, CVC:Ao, and CVC-CI) were significantly different between R-CHF and NC dogs (p < 0.005). A CVC-CI less than 30% (in either M-mode or 2D) was 97% sensitive and 93% specific for diagnosis of R-CHF versus NC effusion. All CVC indices, but not RV:LV ratio, also differed between PCEFF and NC dogs (p < 0.005). Compared to NC, L-CHF dogs had higher CVC:Ao in both 2D (p = 0.017) and M-mode (p = 0.014); compared to R-CHF, L-CHF dogs had higher CVC-CI in both 2D and M-mode (p < 0.005).

Ultrasonographic indices of CVC size and collapsibility are useful to differentiate R-CHF versus NC disease as causes of cavitary effusions. Dogs with L-CHF demonstrate CVC measurements intermediate between R-CHF and NC dogs.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
Source
Copyright
Fri May 01 00:00:00 UTC 2020