Start Date

4-12-2013 12:00 AM

Description

Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems has been suggested—in addition to reducing waste and changing consumption habits—as a way to increase food, feed, fuel, and fiber security in the 21st century. Here we describe three primary strategies of agricultural intensification—conventional intensification, temporal intensification, and spatial intensification—and how they can be used to manage and integrate food and second-generation (2G) crop portfolios. While each strategy has individual merits, combining them to meet case-specific targets may achieve optimum results. Multiple experiments and examples from Iowa, USA illustrate the potential of combining these approaches for agroecological intensification that can provide ecosystem services while maintaining or increasing economic output, thus striking a balance between ‘land sparing’ and ‘land sharing’. Management strategies will vary by the types of markets available, e.g., food, fuel and/or ecosystem services, and the scale of markets supplied, e.g., small heat and power vs. large cellulosic ethanol. Future research should holistically and methodologically evaluate the trade-offs between different management strategies.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-273

Share

COinS
 
Dec 4th, 12:00 AM

Producing food, feed and energy: How can agriculture do it all?

Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems has been suggested—in addition to reducing waste and changing consumption habits—as a way to increase food, feed, fuel, and fiber security in the 21st century. Here we describe three primary strategies of agricultural intensification—conventional intensification, temporal intensification, and spatial intensification—and how they can be used to manage and integrate food and second-generation (2G) crop portfolios. While each strategy has individual merits, combining them to meet case-specific targets may achieve optimum results. Multiple experiments and examples from Iowa, USA illustrate the potential of combining these approaches for agroecological intensification that can provide ecosystem services while maintaining or increasing economic output, thus striking a balance between ‘land sparing’ and ‘land sharing’. Management strategies will vary by the types of markets available, e.g., food, fuel and/or ecosystem services, and the scale of markets supplied, e.g., small heat and power vs. large cellulosic ethanol. Future research should holistically and methodologically evaluate the trade-offs between different management strategies.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.