Campus Units

Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Human Computer Interaction, Virtual Reality Applications Center

Document Type

Article

Publication Version

Accepted Manuscript

Publication Date

12-2020

Journal or Book Title

Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering

Volume

20

Issue

6

First Page

061001

Research Focus Area(s)

Information Engineering, Ergonomics and Human Factors

DOI

10.1115/1.4046006

Abstract

The human performance benefits of four types of guided assembly instructions, including the Microsoft HoloLens 1, were analyzed in the context of a realistic assembly task. Several studies have confirmed the benefits of using augmented reality (AR) work instructions over traditional digital or paper instructions, but few have compared the effects of different AR hardware, including head-mounted displays, for complex assembly tasks. Participants completed a mock wing assembly task using the Microsoft HoloLens 1, and completion time, error count, and net promoter score (NPS) were recorded. These data were compared to data from previous research which employed desktop model-based instructions (MBIs), tablet MBI, and tablet AR instructions for the same task. The use of HoloLens AR instructions led to time saving of 16% over the tablet AR instructions. HoloLens users also had lower error rates than non-AR users. Despite the performance benefits of the HoloLens AR instructions, this condition had a lower NPS than the tablet AR group. The qualitative data showed that some users thought the HoloLens device was uncomfortable and that the tracking was not always exact. Although the users favored the tablet AR condition, the HoloLens condition had significantly faster assembly times. The authors recommend using the HoloLens for complex guided assembly instructions with minor changes, such as allowing the user to toggle the AR instructions on and off at will. The results of this paper can help manufacturing stakeholders understand the benefits of different AR technologies for manual assembly tasks.

Comments

This is a manuscript of a paper published as Hoover, Melynda, Jack Miller, Stephen Gilbert, and Eliot Winer. "Measuring the Performance Impact of Using the Microsoft HoloLens 1 to Provide Guided Assembly Work Instructions." 20, no. 6 Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering (2020): 061001. Paper no. JCISE-19-1008. DOI: 10.1115/1.4046006. Posted with permission.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Copyright Owner

ASME

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Available for download on Wednesday, December 01, 2021

Published Version

Share

COinS