Using Baseline Models to Improve Theories about Emerging Markets

Thumbnail Image
Date
2012-01-01
Authors
Schwab, Andreas
Starbuck, William
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Schwab, Andreas
Associate Professor
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Organizational Unit
Management and Entrepreneurship

The Department of Management and Entrepreneurship seeks to provide students with the knowledge of organizations and management functions within organizations. Graduates will be able to understand work-related behavior, competitive strategy and advantage, strategies of international business, and human-resource management practices.

History
The Department of Management was formed in 1984 in the College of Business Administration (later College of Business).

Dates of Existence
1984 - present

Related Units

Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Department
Management and Entrepreneurship
Abstract

Purpose – This chapter reports on a rapidly growing trend in the analysis of data about emerging market (EM) economies – the use of baseline models as comparisons for explanatory models. Baseline models estimate expected values for the dependent variable in the absence of a hypothesized causal effect but set higher standards than do traditional null hypotheses tests that expect no effect.

Design/methodology/approach – Although the use of baseline models research originated in the 1960s, it has not been widely discussed, or even acknowledged, in the EM literature. We surveyed published EM studies to determine trends in the use of baseline models.

Findings – We categorize and describe the different types of baseline models that scholars have used in EM studies, and draw inferences about the differences between more effective and less effective uses of baseline models.

Value – We believe that comparisons with baseline models offer distinct methodological advantages for the iterative development of better explanatory models and a deeper understanding of empirical phenomena.

Comments

This is a manuscript of an book chapter from Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 7 (2012); 3-33. Doi: 10.1108/S1479-8387(2012)0000007004. Posted with permission.

Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 2012
Collections