Journal or Book Title
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Background: The Necessity–Concerns Framework (NCF) is a multidimensional theory describing the relationship between patients’ positive and negative evaluations of their medication which interplay to influence adherence. Most studies evaluating the NCF have failed to account for the multidimensional nature of the theory, placing the separate dimensions of medication “necessity beliefs” and “concerns” onto a single dimension (e.g., the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire–difference score model).
Purpose: To assess the multidimensional effect of patient medication beliefs (concerns and necessity beliefs) on medication adherence using polynomial regression with response surface analysis.
Methods: Community-dwelling older adults >65 years (n = 1,211) presenting their own prescription for antihypertensive medication to 106 community pharmacies in the Republic of Ireland rated their concerns and necessity beliefs to antihypertensive medications at baseline and their adherence to antihypertensive medication at 12 months via structured telephone interview.
Results: Confirmatory polynomial regression found the difference-score model to be inaccurate; subsequent exploratory analysis identified a quadratic model to be the best-fitting polynomial model. Adherence was lowest among those with strong medication concerns and weak necessity beliefs, and adherence was greatest for those with weak concerns and strong necessity beliefs (slope β = −0.77, p
Conclusion: Results extend evidence supporting the use of polynomial regression to assess the multidimensional effect of medication beliefs on adherence.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
The Society of Behavioral Medicine
Dillon, Paul; Phillips, L. Alison; Gallagher, Paul; Smith, Susan M.; Stuart, Derek; and Cousins, Gráinne, "Assessing the Multidimensional Relationship Between Medication Beliefs and Adherence in Older Adults With Hypertension Using Polynomial Regression" (2018). Psychology Publications. 128.