Location

Brunswick, ME

Start Date

1-1-1990 12:00 AM

Description

Estimation of crack length and depth is of considerable interest to the eddy current testing community, due to their importance in determining the relative severity of the flaw. A paper presented at the INTERMAG-MMM conference in July, 1988 proposes an automated method for estimation using eddy current image data where the material being tested is magnetic [1]. These estimates are within two to one of the correct results over a wide range of EDM slot sizes and aspect ratios, provided the slot length is at least half the mean coil radius. A second motivation for the present work is to provide a benchmark against which other techniques, or variations such as lower sampling density or different flying heights (fixed lift-off), may be measured. Since there is no obvious reason why the same methodology should not work for non-magnetic material tests, seven different sets of data on the twelve EDM slots in a calibration block were run thru a similar algorithm. A brief description of the algorithm will be given, then the data sets will be described, and the results (including some processing variations) discussed.

Book Title

Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation

Volume

9A

Chapter

Chapter 3: Interpretive Signal and Image Processing

Section

B: interpretive and Image Processing

Pages

773-780

DOI

10.1007/978-1-4684-5772-8_97

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 
Jan 1st, 12:00 AM

Eddy Current Image Processing for Crack Size Characterization

Brunswick, ME

Estimation of crack length and depth is of considerable interest to the eddy current testing community, due to their importance in determining the relative severity of the flaw. A paper presented at the INTERMAG-MMM conference in July, 1988 proposes an automated method for estimation using eddy current image data where the material being tested is magnetic [1]. These estimates are within two to one of the correct results over a wide range of EDM slot sizes and aspect ratios, provided the slot length is at least half the mean coil radius. A second motivation for the present work is to provide a benchmark against which other techniques, or variations such as lower sampling density or different flying heights (fixed lift-off), may be measured. Since there is no obvious reason why the same methodology should not work for non-magnetic material tests, seven different sets of data on the twelve EDM slots in a calibration block were run thru a similar algorithm. A brief description of the algorithm will be given, then the data sets will be described, and the results (including some processing variations) discussed.