Location

Snowmass Village, CO

Start Date

1-1-1995 12:00 AM

Description

Multiple-Site Damage (MSD) in aging aircraft has motivated analysis of the fatigue life of a panel containing a row of cracked holes [1–3]. Given the initial MSD configuration and loading conditions, individual cracks are grown incrementally until link-up or the panel failes. First, stress intensity factors are calculated for all cracks. One crack tip is then assumed to advance a small amount, and the cycles for this increment of growth are calculated. The remaining cracks are then grown a distance corresponding to this cyclic interval by employing a fatigue crack growth model to relate the cyclic stress intensity factor and fatigue crack growth rate. After each incremental growth the current crack geometry is compared to one of several failure criteria [3] to determine whether the panel fails. For holes which are initially uncracked, cumulative damage is summed at these locations in conjunction with a Neuber notch analysis. When this strain-life analysis determines that “crack initiation” has occurred at a given hole, crack growth calculations continue at that location, and the routine is repeated until the failure criterion is satisfied.

Volume

14B

Chapter

Chapter 7: Materials' Degradation and Specific Applications

Section

Fatigue Damage and Crack Characterization

Pages

1947-1954

DOI

10.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4_249

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 
Jan 1st, 12:00 AM

Analysis of Multiple Sight Damage with Implications for Nondestructive Evaluation

Snowmass Village, CO

Multiple-Site Damage (MSD) in aging aircraft has motivated analysis of the fatigue life of a panel containing a row of cracked holes [1–3]. Given the initial MSD configuration and loading conditions, individual cracks are grown incrementally until link-up or the panel failes. First, stress intensity factors are calculated for all cracks. One crack tip is then assumed to advance a small amount, and the cycles for this increment of growth are calculated. The remaining cracks are then grown a distance corresponding to this cyclic interval by employing a fatigue crack growth model to relate the cyclic stress intensity factor and fatigue crack growth rate. After each incremental growth the current crack geometry is compared to one of several failure criteria [3] to determine whether the panel fails. For holes which are initially uncracked, cumulative damage is summed at these locations in conjunction with a Neuber notch analysis. When this strain-life analysis determines that “crack initiation” has occurred at a given hole, crack growth calculations continue at that location, and the routine is repeated until the failure criterion is satisfied.