Measurement Model-Based Prediction of Correlated Flaw Signal

Thumbnail Image
Date
1995
Authors
Jeong, Peter
Gray, Tim
Schmerr, Lester
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Center for Nondestructive Evaluation

Begun in 1973, the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE) is the premier international NDE meeting designed to provide an interface between research and early engineering through the presentation of current ideas and results focused on facilitating a rapid transfer to engineering development.

This site provides free, public access to papers presented at the annual QNDE conference between 1983 and 1999, and abstracts for papers presented at the conference since 2001.

Department
Abstract

The Center for NDE, Iowa State University, has developed an ultrasonic pulse compression system using Golay codes, and demonstrated the enhanced signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) in highly energy absorbent materials such as rubber, plastics, corks, and some composites. Recently, an attempt has been made to theoretically predict ultrasonic pulse compression (correlated) flaw signals (e.g., voids) using the ultrasonic measurement model developed earlier at the same university. Predictions were made by the use of long coded waveforms (Golay codes) as inputs to the measurement model instead of the spike pulse in conventional ultrasonics. The results were then compared with experimentally measured conventional ultrasonic flaw signals. The results indicated that the ultrasonic pulse compression flaw signals can be predicted as accurate as conventional ultrasonic signals. In addition, the equivalent pulse of the Golay codes (delta-like pulse) was also used as an input to the measurement model to predict the same flaw signal, and it was demonstrated that the Golay codes and the equivalent pulse produce effectively the same results although the signal processing methods are significantly different.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Subject Categories
Keywords
Copyright
Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1995