Characterization of Ultrasonic Focused Transducers Using Axial Scans and C-Scans

Thumbnail Image
Date
1997
Authors
Yalda, I.
Panetta, P.
Margetan, Frank
Thompson, R. Bruce
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Person
Margetan, Frank
Associate Scientist
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Center for Nondestructive Evaluation

Begun in 1973, the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE) is the premier international NDE meeting designed to provide an interface between research and early engineering through the presentation of current ideas and results focused on facilitating a rapid transfer to engineering development.

This site provides free, public access to papers presented at the annual QNDE conference between 1983 and 1999, and abstracts for papers presented at the conference since 2001.

Department
Abstract

In the ultrasonic community there is a growing use of models to simulate inspection processes [1,2]. One necessary input to such models is knowledge of the transducer’s radiation pattern. The radiation pattern of a commercial transducer often approximates that of an ideal, focused, piston transducer with appropriately chosen parameters (element dimensions and focal lengths), and these“ideal probe” parameters often serve as model inputs. In this paper we demonstrate beam mapping methods for determining these parameters. For probes with circularly symmetric beam cross-sections, an axial scan of the beam suffices. For more general probes, C-scan data are acquired to map out the beam cross section at several different waterpaths. In each case, the transducer parameters are determined by adjusting their values to minimize the discrepancy between the measured and model amplitudes. A technique for handling misaligned data is also described. Measured and fitted fields are compared for a variety of transducers (spherically, cylindrically, and bi-cylindrically focused) including one with a presumably damaged element. In addition, the axial scan and C-scan methods are compared for one circular, spherically-focused transducer.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Keywords
Copyright
Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 UTC 1997