Location

La Jolla, CA

Start Date

1-1-1998 12:00 AM

Description

Phase cancellation effects can occur if irregularities in a specimen distort the ultrasonic phase fronts presented to a spatially extended piezoelectric receiving transducer. Among other causes, surface roughness can contribute to wavefront distortion [1] which, in turn, leads to phase cancellation at a piezoelectric receiving transducer. To minimize this problem specimens are often limited to materials that can be prepared with smooth surfaces. Ideally, the nature of the nondestructive evaluation of materials implies that the specimens should not have to be altered merely for the sake of examination. Specifically, actions such as grinding rough surfaces only to improve the quality of the inspection are contrary to the spirit of nondestructive evaluation. Previous studies have shown that phaseinsensitive detection reduces the effects of phase cancellation [2–5]. Therefore phaseinsensitive detection should be less significantly influenced than phase-sensitive detection by the presence of rough surfaces that may commonly arise from specimen production.

Book Title

Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation

Volume

17B

Chapter

Chapter 8: Systems, Reliability, Training

Section

System Reliability

Pages

2021-2028

DOI

10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_262

Language

en

File Format

application/pdf

Share

COinS
 
Jan 1st, 12:00 AM

A Comparison of the Ability of Phase-Insensitive and Phase-Sensitive Ultrasonic Receivers to Detect Material Abnormalities Beneath Rough Surfaces

La Jolla, CA

Phase cancellation effects can occur if irregularities in a specimen distort the ultrasonic phase fronts presented to a spatially extended piezoelectric receiving transducer. Among other causes, surface roughness can contribute to wavefront distortion [1] which, in turn, leads to phase cancellation at a piezoelectric receiving transducer. To minimize this problem specimens are often limited to materials that can be prepared with smooth surfaces. Ideally, the nature of the nondestructive evaluation of materials implies that the specimens should not have to be altered merely for the sake of examination. Specifically, actions such as grinding rough surfaces only to improve the quality of the inspection are contrary to the spirit of nondestructive evaluation. Previous studies have shown that phaseinsensitive detection reduces the effects of phase cancellation [2–5]. Therefore phaseinsensitive detection should be less significantly influenced than phase-sensitive detection by the presence of rough surfaces that may commonly arise from specimen production.