Multiple Focused EMAT Designs for Improved Surface Breaking Defect Characterization

Thumbnail Image
Date
2016-01-01
Authors
Thring, C.
Fan, Y.
Edwards, R.
Major Professor
Advisor
Committee Member
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Authors
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Is Version Of
Versions
Series
Series
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
Center for Nondestructive Evaluation

Begun in 1973, the Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation (QNDE) is the premier international NDE meeting designed to provide an interface between research and early engineering through the presentation of current ideas and results focused on facilitating a rapid transfer to engineering development.

This site provides free, public access to papers presented at the annual QNDE conference between 1983 and 1999, and abstracts for papers presented at the conference since 2001.

Department
Abstract

Ultrasonic Rayleigh waves can be employed for the detection of surface breaking defects such as rolling contact fatigue and stress corrosion cracking. Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers (EMATs) are well suited to this technique as they can directly generate Rayleigh waves within the sample without the requirement for wedges, and they are robust and inexpensive compared to laser ultrasonics.

Three different EMAT coil types have been developed, and these are compared to assess their ability to detect and characterize small (down to 0.5 mm depth, 1 mm diameter) surface breaking defects in aluminum. These designs are: a pair of linear meander coils used in a pseudopulse-echo mode, a pair of focused meander coils also used in pseudo-pulse-echo mode, and a pair of focused racetrack coils used in pitch-catch mode. The linear meander coils are able to detect most of the defects tested, but have a lower signal to noise ratio and give limited sizing information. The focused meander coils can also detect all defects tested, but have the advantage that they can also characterize the defect sizes on the sample surface, and have a stronger sensitivity at their focal point. The focused racetrack coils have been used to characterize smaller defects, including depth characterization for defects shallower than ~1.5 mm depth. To remove problems due to EMAT orientation relative to a defect a set of four confocal racetrack coils (one generating and three detecting) have been designed to find defects in both transmission and reflection. Measurements using all four EMAT designs will be presented and compared for high resolution imaging of surface-breaking defects.

Comments
Description
Keywords
Citation
DOI
Source
Subject Categories
Copyright