Degree Type

Dissertation

Date of Award

2005

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy

Department

Mechanical Engineering

First Advisor

Michael B. Pate

Second Advisor

Ron Nelson

Abstract

Relative humidity sensors are common components in building heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems, and their performance can significantly impact energy use in these systems. A study was undertaken to test and evaluate the most commonly used relative humidity sensors in building HVAC systems, namely the capacitive and resistive types. Sensor models from six different manufacturers were used for testing. Three sensors of each model for a total of 18 sensors were tested, nine of them were capacitive-type sensors and nine were resistive-type sensors. The performance of these sensors was determined by subjecting the sensors to a series of tests that included accuracy, linearity, repeatability, hysteresis, ageing, response time and stress. For each test, a detailed method of test was developed and peer reviewed.;The accuracy test results showed that two of the six humidity sensor models were within manufacturer specified accuracy, while a third sensor model did not met the manufactured specified accuracy at any humidity level tested, and finally, the remaining three sensor models, met the manufacturer specified accuracy for only part of the humidity range. Further, the repeatability of all sensors models at 50% RH and 15, 25, and 35°C was within 1.5% RH. The maximum hysteresis for all sensors was less than 3.2% for all humidities and temperatures. And finally, at 25°C, Model-B sensor had the largest nonlinearity of -3.8% while Model-C sensor had the least nonlinearity of 0.0%.;The accuracy results after the ageing test showed that only one sensor out of twelve sensors was unaffected both before and after the ageing test, while four sensors out of the remaining eleven sensors were unaffected after the ageing test.;The response time test results showed that the average response times of relative humidity sensors ranged between 7 sec and 96 sec.;The accuracy test results after the stress test showed that two out of six sensors remain unaffected at all relative humidities, while two out of the remaining four sensor models were affected at any relative humidities evaluated. The remaining two sensor models failed after the stress test.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-71

Publisher

Digital Repository @ Iowa State University, http://lib.dr.iastate.edu

Copyright Owner

Shailesh Narayan Joshi

Language

en

Proquest ID

AAI3172224

File Format

application/pdf

File Size

174 pages

Share

COinS